Network meta-analysis for comparative effectiveness research. (2018)

• Record Type: Book
• Further Information: Note: Sofia Dias, A.E. Ades, Nicky J. Welton, Jeroen P. Jansen, Alexander J. Sutton.
• Authors: Dias, Sofia, 1977-; Ades, A. E; Welton, Nicky J; Jansen, Jeroen P; Sutton, A. J
• Contents: Preface xiii List of Abbreviations xxi About the Companion Website xxv 1 Introduction to Evidence Synthesis 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Why Indirect Comparisons and Network Meta?]Analysis? 2 1.3 Some Simple Methods 4 1.4 An Example of a Network Meta?]Analysis 6 1.5 Assumptions Made by Indirect Comparisons and Network Meta?]Analysis 9 1.6 Which Trials to Include in a Network 12 1.6.1 The Need for a Unique Set of Trials 12 1.7 The Definition of Treatments and Outcomes: Network Connectivity 14 1.7.1 Lumping and Splitting 14 1.7.2 Relationships Between Multiple Outcomes 15 1.7.3 How Large Should a Network Be? 15 1.8 Summary 16 1.9 Exercises 16 2 The Core Model 19 2.1 Bayesian Meta?]Analysis 19 2.2 Development of the Core Models 20 2.2.1 Worked Example: Meta?]Analysis of Binomial Data 21 2.2.1.1 Model Specification: Two Treatments 21 2.2.1.2 WinBUGS Implementation: Two Treatments 25 2.2.2 Extension to Indirect Comparisons and Network Meta?]Analysis 32 2.2.2.1 Incorporating Multi?]Arm Trials 35 2.2.3 Worked Example: Network Meta?]Analysis 36 2.2.3.1 WinBUGS Implementation 37 2.3 Technical Issues in Network Meta?]Analysis 50 2.3.1 Choice of Reference Treatment 50 2.3.2 Choice of Prior Distributions 51 2.3.3 Choice of Scale 53 2.3.4 Connected Networks 54 2.4 Advantages of a Bayesian Approach 55 2.5 Summary of Key Points and Further Reading 56 2.6 Exercises 57 3 Model Fit, Model Comparison and Outlier Detection 59 3.1 Introduction 59 3.2 Assessing Model Fit 60 3.2.1 Deviance 60 3.2.2 Residual Deviance 61 3.2.3 Zero Counts* 62 3.2.4 Worked Example: Full Thrombolytic Treatments Network 62 3.2.4.1 Posterior Mean Deviance, D̅model 62 3.2.4.2 Posterior Mean Residual Deviance, D̅res 64 3.3 Model Comparison 66 3.3.1 Effective Number of Parameters, pD 68 3.3.2 Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) 69 3.3.2.1 *Leverage Plots 70 3.3.3 Worked Example: Full Thrombolytic Treatments Network 70 3.4 Outlier Detection in Network Meta?]Analysis 75 3.4.1 Outlier Detection in Pairwise Meta?]Analysis 75 3.4.2 Predictive Cross?]Validation for Network Meta?]Analysis 79 3.4.3 Note on Multi?]Arm Trials 85 3.4.4 WinBUGS Code: Predictive Cross?]Validation for Network Meta?]Analysis 86 3.5 Summary and Further Reading 89 3.6 Exercises 90 4 Generalised Linear Models 93 4.1 A Unified Framework for Evidence Synthesis 93 4.2 The Generic Network Meta?]Analysis Models 94 4.3 Univariate Arm?]Based Likelihoods 99 4.3.1 Rate Data: Poisson Likelihood and Log Link 99 4.3.1.1 WinBUGS Implementation 100 4.3.1.2 Example: Dietary Fat 101 4.3.1.3 Results: Dietary Fat 104 4.3.2 Rate Data: Binomial Likelihood and Cloglog Link 105 4.3.2.1 WinBUGS Implementation 107 4.3.2.2 Example: Diabetes 109 4.3.2.3 Results: Diabetes 112 4.3.3 Continuous Data: Normal Likelihood and Identity Link 114 4.3.3.1 Before/After Studies: Change from Baseline Measures 115 4.3.3.2 Standardised Mean Differences 115 4.3.3.3 WinBUGS Implementation 116 4.3.3.4 Example: Parkinson’s 117 4.3.3.5 Results: Parkinson’s 119 4.4 Contrast?]Based Likelihoods 120 4.4.1 Continuous Data: Treatment Differences 121 4.4.1.1 Multi?]Arm Trials with Treatment Differences (Trial?]Based Summaries) 122 4.4.1.2 *WinBUGS Implementation 123 4.4.1.3 Example: Parkinson’s (Treatment Differences as Data) 125 4.4.1.4 Results: Parkinson’s (Treatment Differences as Data) 127 4.5 *Multinomial Likelihoods 127 4.5.1 Ordered Categorical Data: Multinomial Likelihood and Probit Link 128 4.5.1.1 WinBUGS Implementation 132 4.5.1.2 Example: Psoriasis 133 4.5.1.3 Results: Psoriasis 137 4.5.2 Competing Risks: Multinomial Likelihood and Log Link 138 4.5.2.1 WinBUGS Implementation 140 4.5.2.2 Example: Schizophrenia 141 4.5.2.3 Results: Schizophrenia 143 4.6 *Shared Parameter Models 146 4.6.1 Example: Parkinson’s (Mixed Treatment Difference and Arm?]Level Data) 147 4.6.2 Results: Parkinson’s (Mixed Treatment Difference and Arm?]Level Data) 148 4.7 Choice of Prior Distributions 149 4.8 Zero Cells 149 4.9 Summary of Key Points and Further Reading 150 4.10 Exercises 151 5 Network Meta?]Analysis Within Cost?]Effectiveness Analysis 155 5.1 Introduction 155 5.2 Sources of Evidence for Relative Treatment Effects and the Baseline Model 156 5.3 The Baseline Model 158 5.3.1 Estimating the Baseline Model in WinBUGS 158 5.3.2 Alternative Computation Methods for the Baseline Model 162 5.3.3 *Arm?]Based Meta?]Analytic Models 162 5.3.4 Baseline Models with Covariates 164 5.3.4.1 Using Aggregate Data 164 5.3.4.2 Risk Equations for the Baseline Model Basedon Individual Patient Data 165 5.4 The Natural History Model 165 5.5 Model Validation and Calibration Through Multi?]Parameter Synthesis 167 5.6 Generating the Outputs Required for Cost?]Effectiveness Analysis 169 5.6.1 Generating a CEA 169 5.6.2 Heterogeneity in the Context of Decision?]Making 170 5.7 Strategies to Implement Cost?]Effectiveness Analyses 173 5.7.1 Bayesian Posterior Simulation: One?]Stage Approach 174 5.7.2 Bayesian Posterior Simulation: Two?]Stage Approach 174 5.7.3 Multiple Software Platforms and Automation of Network Meta?]Analysis 175 5.8 Summary and Further Reading 177 5.9 Exercises 178 6 Adverse Events and Other Sparse Outcome Data 179 6.1 Introduction 179 6.2 Challenges Regarding the Analysis of Sparse Data in Pairwise and Network Meta?]Analysis 180 6.2.1 Network Structure and Connectivity 182 6.2.2 Assessing Convergence and Model Fit 182 6.3 Strategies to Improve the Robustness of Estimation of Effects from Sparse Data in Network Meta?]Analysis 183 6.3.1 Specifying Informative Prior Distributions for Response in Trial Reference Groups 183 6.3.2 Specifying an Informative Prior Distribution for the Between Study Variance Parameters 184 6.3.3 Specifying Reference Group Responses as Exchangeable with Random Effects 184 6.3.4 Situational Modelling Extensions 185 6.3.5 Specification of Informative Prior Distributions Versus Use of Continuity Corrections 186 6.4 Summary and Further Reading 186 6.5 Exercises 187 7 Checking for Inconsistency 189 7.1 Introduction 189 7.2 Network Structure 190 7.2.1 Inconsistency Degrees of Freedom 191 7.2.2 Defining Inconsistency in the Presence of Multi?]Arm Trials 192 7.3 Loop Specific Tests for Inconsistency 195 7.3.1 Networks with Independent Tests for Inconsistency 195 7.3.1.1 Bucher Method for Single Loops of Evidence 195 7.3.1.2 Example: HIV 196 7.3.1.3 Extension of Bucher Method to Networks with Multiple Loops: Enuresis Example 197 7.3.1.4 Obtaining the ‘Direct’ Estimates of Inconsistency 199 7.3.2 Methods for General Networks 200 7.3.2.1 Repeat Application of the Bucher Method 201 7.3.2.2 A Back?]Calculation Method 202 7.3.2.3 *Variance Measures of Inconsistency 202 7.3.2.4 *Node?]Splitting 203 7.4 A Global Test for Loop Inconsistency 205 7.4.1 Inconsistency Model with Unrelated Mean Relative Effects 206 7.4.2 Example: Full Thrombolytic Treatments Network 210 7.4.2.1 Adjusted Standard Errors for Multi?]Arm Trials 214 7.4.3 Example: Parkinson’s 215 7.4.4 Example: Diabetes 218</
• Edition: 1st
• Publisher Details: Hoboken, New Jersey : John Wiley & Sons, Inc
• Publication Date: 2018
• Extent: 1 online resource
• Subjects: 610.72; Meta-analysis
• Languages: English
• ISBNs: 9781118951729; 9781118951712
• Related ISBNs: 9781118647509
• Notes: Note: Description based on CIP data; resource not viewed.
• Access Rights: Legal Deposit; Only available on premises controlled by the deposit library and to one user at any one time; The Legal Deposit Libraries (Non-Print Works) Regulations (UK).
• Access Usage: Restricted: Printing from this resource is governed by The Legal Deposit Libraries (Non-Print Works) Regulations (UK) and UK copyright law currently in force.