Beyond the control of God? : six views on the problem of God and abstract objects /: six views on the problem of God and abstract objects. (2014 copyright 2014)

• Record Type: Book
• Further Information: Note: Edited by Paul M. Gould.
• Editors: Gould, Paul M, 1971-
• Contents: Acknowledgments Introduction to the Problem of God and Abstract Objects Paul M. Gould, Southwest Baptist Theological Seminary, USA 1. God and Propositions Keith Yandell, University of Wisconsin, USA Response to Yandell Paul M. Gould, Southwest Baptist Theological Seminary, USA & Richard Brian Davis, Tyndale University, Canada Greg Welty, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, USA William Lane Craig, Talbot School of Theology, USA Scott A. Shalkowski, University of Leeds, United Kingdom Graham Oppy, Monash University, Australia Response to Critics Keith Yandell, University of Wisconsin, USA 2. Modified Theistic Activism Paul M. Gould, Southwest Baptist Theological Seminary, USA & Richard Brian Davis, Tyndale University, Canada Response to Gould/Davis Keith Yandell, University of Wisconsin, USA Greg Welty, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, USA William Lane Craig, Talbot School of Theology, USA Scott A. Shalkowski, University of Leeds, United Kingdom Graham Oppy, Monash University, Australia Response to Critics Paul M. Gould, Southwest Baptist Theological Seminary, USA & Richard Brian Davis, Tyndale University, Canada 3. Theistic Conceptual Realism Greg Welty, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, USA Response to Welty Keith Yandell, University of Wisconsin, USA Paul M. Gould, Southwest Baptist Theological Seminary, USA & Richard Brian Davis, Tyndale University, Canada William Lane Craig, Talbot School of Theology, USA Scott A. Shalkowski, University of Leeds, United Kingdom Graham Oppy, Monash University, Australia Response to Critics Greg Welty, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, USA 4. Anti-Platonism William Lane Craig, Talbot School of Theology, USA Response to Craig Keith Yandell, University of Wisconsin, USA Paul M. Gould, Southwest Baptist Theological Seminary, USA & Richard Brian Davis, Tyndale University, Canada Greg Welty, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, USA Scott A. Shalkowski, University of Leeds, United Kingdom Graham Oppy, Monash University, Australia Response to Critics William Lane Craig, Talbot School of Theology, USA 5. God with or without Abstract Objects Scott A. Shalkowski, University of Leeds, United Kingdom Response to Shalkowski Keith Yandell, University of Wisconsin, USA Paul M. Gould, Southwest Baptist Theological Seminary, USA & Richard Brian Davis, Tyndale University, Canada Greg Welty, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, USA William Lane Craig, Talbot School of Theology, USA Graham Oppy, Monash University, Australia Response to Critics Scott A. Shalkowski, University of Leeds, United Kingdom 6. Abstract Objects? Who Cares! Graham Oppy, Monash University, Australia Response to Oppy Keith Yandell, University of Wisconsin, USA Paul M. Gould, Southwest Baptist Theological Seminary, USA & Richard Brian Davis, Tyndale University, Canada Greg Welty, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, USA William Lane Craig, Talbot School of Theology, USA Scott A. Shalkowski, University of Leeds, United Kingdom Response to Critics Graham Oppy, Monash University, Australia Bibliography Contributors Index.
• Publisher Details: New York : Bloomsbury Academic
• Publication Date: 2014
• Extent: 1 online resource (224 pages)
• Subjects: 212.7; Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge; God; Abstraction; Object (Philosophy); Philosophy -- Epistemology; Religion -- Philosophy; Philosophy of religion
• Languages: English
• ISBNs: 9781623569372; 1623569370
• Access Rights: Legal Deposit; Only available on premises controlled by the deposit library and to one user at any one time; The Legal Deposit Libraries (Non-Print Works) Regulations (UK).
• Access Usage: Restricted: Printing from this resource is governed by The Legal Deposit Libraries (Non-Print Works) Regulations (UK) and UK copyright law currently in force.