Search

Search Constraints

You searched for: Author/Creator van Dijk, Bob W.

Search Results

1. [IC‐P‐132]: WHEN MEASURING HIPPOCAMPAL ATROPHY, DO THE SEGMENTATION NOISE DISTRIBUTIONS OF METHODS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BACK TO BACK REPRODUCIBILITY, HAVE GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTIONS?. (1st July 2017)

2. [P3–389]: WHEN MEASURING HIPPOCAMPAL ATROPHY, DO THE SEGMENTATION NOISE DISTRIBUTIONS OF METHODS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BACK‐TO‐BACK REPRODUCIBILITY, HAVE GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTIONS?. (1st July 2017)

3. IC‐P‐106: Reproducibility of hippocampal atrophy rate at 1.5T and 3T for freesurfer and MAPS‐HBSI using the ADNI1 data set. (1st July 2015)

4. IC‐P‐133: The Measurement of Hippocampal Atrophy Rates With MRI for A 3‐Year Study Appears to be at Least 3 Times More Sensitive Than A 1‐Year Study Based on Back‐To‐Back Reproducibility. (1st July 2016)

5. Magnetoencephalography as a Putative Biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease. (24th March 2011)

6. P1‐235: THE HIPPOCAMPAL BOUNDARY SHIFT INTEGRAL IS 70% MORE REPRODUCIBLE THAN OTHER ATROPHY ALGORITHMS. (1st July 2014)

7. P3‐170: Reproducibility of hippocampal atrophy rate at 1.5T and 3T for freesurfer and MAPS‐HBSI using the ADNI1 data set. (1st July 2015)

8. P4‐220: The Measurement of Hippocampal Atrophy Rates With MRI for A 3‐Year Study Appears to Be at Least 3 Times More Sensitive Than A 1‐Year Study Based on Back‐To‐Back Reproducibility. (1st July 2016)

9. Reproducibility of hippocampal atrophy rates measured with manual, FreeSurfer, AdaBoost, FSL/FIRST and the MAPS-HBSI methods in Alzheimer's disease. (30th June 2016)

10. Reproducibility of hippocampal atrophy rates measured with manual, FreeSurfer, AdaBoost, FSL/FIRST and the MAPS-HBSI methods in Alzheimer's disease. (30th June 2016)